Autonomous offensive testing. Human-validated evidence.

Real exploits. Real evidence. AI speed, human judgment.

Pentoma tests web apps, source code, and AI systems with agentic discovery, deterministic replay, and human validation — then ships reports your engineers can fix and your auditors can trust.

Backed by SEWORKS20+ years in offensive securityBuilt for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and AI governance evidence

SEWORKS has run offensive-security engagements since 2014 — across web, application, and adversarial testing. Pentoma is that practice, rebuilt as a continuous, AI-assisted product.

Partner
Drata — SOC 2 & ISO 27001 evidence
Three ways to prove security

Security testing that reads like engineering work.

Every product produces the same shape of output: reproducible findings, scoped evidence, and compliance mappings the team can act on without translation.

Web App/API Pentesting

Pentoma Web

Authenticated, business-logic-aware web and API penetration testing with AI discovery, deterministic replay, and human-validated evidence.

evidence: OWASP A03 - reproducible payload - SOC2 CC7.1 mapping
Source-Code Vulnerability Discovery

Pentoma Code

Pentoma Code is offensive source-code analysis. We hunt exploitable vulnerabilities, reconstruct full attack chains from source to sink, and surface 0-day candidates. Findings are validated by deterministic data-flow proof and human reviewers before they reach a customer report.

evidence: vulnerable line · source-to-sink chain · validated finding
LLM and agent security assessment

Pentoma AI Red Teaming

OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage with replayable prompts, observed behavior, policy mapping, and expert interpretation.

evidence: LLM01 - prompt replay - policy-safe reproduction

Side-by-side

Same shape of evidence. Three different targets.

Each product looks at a different surface, but ships the same kind of finding — what it tested, how it tested, and what the report contains.

Pentoma Web

Application layer

Target

Running web applications and APIs

Method

AI-assisted exploration, business-logic probing, deterministic replay, and human validation

Output

Confirmed application findings with request/response proof and compliance mappings

Pentoma Code

Source code

Target

Source-code repositories, pull requests, and release branches

Method

Offensive static analysis: vulnerability hunting, source-to-sink reasoning, attack-chain reconstruction, validated by reviewers

Output

Validated vulnerabilities, attack-chain evidence, line-level remediation guidance, and 0-day candidates worth coordinated disclosure

Pentoma AI Red Teaming

AI systems

Target

LLM endpoints, RAG flows, tools, plugins, and agents

Method

Adversarial prompts, agent-boundary tests, behavior replay, and policy checks

Output

AI risk evidence mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 and governance controls

Proof, not promises

Three artifacts that earn the meeting.

Pentoma is a small, founder-led team. Trust comes from artifacts you can read, fork, and forward — not from logo walls we have not earned yet.

How it works

From connection to evidence in one controlled loop.

Pentoma does not hide behind a black box. The workflow exposes scope, cost, evidence, and triage reasoning so security and engineering can move together.

01 / connect

Connect the target

Add a domain, repository, or LLM endpoint. Pentoma scopes the engagement and records the evidence boundary up front.

02 / agent runs

The agent executes

Reconnaissance, adversarial tests, replay, and triage run in a controlled loop with cost, scope, and compliance context visible throughout.

03 / evidence ships

Findings become proof

Each confirmed issue ships with reproduction steps, severity rationale, remediation, and auditor-ready control mappings.

Mappings rendered into every report.

Pentoma gives auditors the same evidence engineers used to fix the issue: endpoint, payload, replay, severity rationale, and control mapping.

SOC 2

Vulnerability detection, response, and change-management proof.

CC7.1 · CC7.2 · CC8.1

ISO 27001

Technical vulnerability management and risk treatment evidence.

A.8.8 · A.5.36

AI Governance

Evidence for AI risk and governance reviews — adversarial replay, agent-boundary checks, and policy mapping.

Prompt replay · Agent boundary · Policy

Ready when your audit starts

Run a security engagement that produces findings and proof in the same motion.

Request assessment